Censorship in Canada’s Chinese-Language Media

 

Cindy Gu

Publisher, Epoch Times

 

Good afternoon.

 

My name is Cindy Gu, and I am the publisher of the Canadian editions of The Epoch Times, a general interest newspaper that is published in more than ten languages, in thirty countries. Our Chinese-language edition is one of the largest and most widely distributed Chinese-language newspapers in Canada and the world.

 

As I’ll describe today, and as we’ve shown in our series on Chinese-language media censorship in Canada, it is rare for any Chinese-language media in this country to report candidly about human rights abuses in China, or, for that matter, to stray from the Chinese Communist Party line on almost any significant issue.

 

The Epoch Times is an exception to this widespread practice of censorship. We were the first newspaper to report on the outbreak and cover-up of SARS, for example, at a time when other Chinese-language media in Canada were largely echoing Chinese government denials and uncritically publishing assurances from the Chinese authorities that it was safe to travel to China.

 

Our newspaper was born out of the need for an independent voice on China. Since it was founded in 2000, The Epoch Times has become the leading source for independent, uncensored information on China. A recent study of the leading software used to break through firewalls in countries that censor the internet found that more people use such programs to visit our website than to visit any other website in the world aside from Google.

 

Each month our website receives millions of hits from web users inside China. And we experience first-hand the regime’s efforts to repress sensitive news. For example, in 2004 we published a book-length series of editorials called the Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party. It is perhaps the first-ever complete analysis of the history and nature of the Communist Party, detailing the atrocities it has inflicted on the Chinese people, from political campaigns such as the Great Leap Forward to the Tiananmen Square Massacre in 1989 to the persecution of Falun Gong today.

 

A study carried out by the universities of Oxford, Harvard, and Toronto found that no term was more heavily censored on the Chinese internet than the title of this editorial series: “The Nine Commentaries.” Still, millions of people from inside China have accessed our website and after reading this series, and have renounced their ties to the Communist Party, Communist Youth League, and Communist Young Pioneers. So when I speak about censorship, I speak from experience.

 

Today, I will talk about three things:

 

1.     First, I will describe the kind of censorship we have observed in Chinese-language media in Canada – namely, self-censorship.

2.     Second, I will talk about how this situation came about.

3.     Third, I will talk about some possible consequences of this censorship in terms of Canadian sovereignty.

 

1. Examples of Self-Censorship

 

On March 29, I was in Toronto’s Dundas Square to witness a rally in support of the Chinese regime’s crackdown in Tibet. Close to 1000 red flag-waving Chinese gathered there. Some shouted at the small group of Tibetans who had gathered nearby in protest with slogans such as “Dalai Lama die!”, “Dalai Lama lies!”, and “Liar, liar!”

 

Participants argued that the Dalai Lama was responsible for the turmoil in Tibet, and they denounced Western media coverage as lies. An event with similar overtones was held April 13 on Parliament Hill.

 

Chris, an organizer of the Dundas Square event told The Epoch Times in an interview: "The violence [is] created by the Tibetan people . . . they are against all the other ethnic people; they just want to drive everyone out . . . The Chinese government didn't do anything wrong." Chris added that he relies on Chinese-language media such as Sing Tao Daily, a newspaper, to inform him about Tibet.

 

The Epoch Times reviewed dozens of articles from Chinese newspapers in Canada and found a consistent pattern of reporting that parroted the Chinese communist party's line on events unfolding in Tibet. The papers relied heavily on Chinese government sources and used inflammatory quotes throughout their reports that matched those used by the regime.

 

One story that ran in the Sing Tao was particularly telling. In Canada, Sing Tao is majority owned by Torstar, which also publishes the Toronto Star. However, the newspaper maintains an editorial relationship with the parent Sing Tao company in Hong Kong.

 

On April 13, both the Toronto Star and Sing Tao ran what was purportedly the same article about Tibet on Page One. It was written by a Star immigration reporter, but the Sing Tao version had some notable edits.

 

The Star story had the headline "Chinese Canadians Conflicted on Tibet," and it discussed some Chinese-Canadians’ hopes for human rights as well as some who have nationalistic sentiments towards the Olympics and perceived Tibetan interference in the Games. It also quoted observers, such as myself, who said the Chinese regime was intentionally confusing national pride with support for the Communist party’s policies in Tibet.

 

The Sing Tao version stripped criticism of the Chinese regime and comments on human rights. It opened with two paragraphs berating Western news coverage and critics of the crackdown in Tibet. It ran under the headline, "The West Attacks China With Tibet Issue, Inciting Chinese Patriotism Overseas."

 

While the media’s treatment of Tibet in Canada provides a recent and familiar example, the same pattern can be found with each issue sensitive to the Chinese authorities, and the results can sometimes be extreme.

 

For example, just as the Chinese authorities began to face criticism over the shoddy construction of schools that collapsed in the Sichuan earthquake, killing thousands of children, Chinese state-run media cooked up a story that Falun Gong practitioners in Flushing, New York City were disrupting efforts to collect earthquake donations.

 

In fact, the Falun Gong adherents had been manning a booth in Flushing’s Chinatown that drew attention to the persecution the Communist regime inflicted on Falun Gong, and there’s no evidence they had disrupted any donation efforts. Yet at least a dozen Chinese-language media have echoed the party line, inciting resentment toward Falun Gong in New York City.

 

For more than three weeks, a mob of angry Chinese sometimes numbering in the hundreds have surrounded the Falun Gong believers in Flushing, cursing and sometimes beating them. Flushing police have confirmed arrests of six members of the mob, and last week two U.S. lawmakers called on the government to deport the Chinese consul general in New York, who was caught on audiotape boasting about his role in rallying the mob. 

 

2.  What’s Behind the Self-Censorship?

 

How did the Chinese regime come to have such apparent influence over Chinese-language media in North America? Prior to 1989, most Chinese-language media operations in Canada originated in Hong Kong or Taiwan and had little influence from the state media censors in China. However, the Tiananmen Massacre in 1989 drew condemnation from the Chinese diaspora overseas, many of whom still had strong connections inside Mainland China. CSIS warned that this led the regime to double efforts to control its message abroad, including Canada, the Globe and Mail reported in 2000. 

 

The strategy that followed was described in a 2001 briefing by the Jamestown Foundation, a Washington-based think-tank that monitors threats to democracy and freedom. According to Jamestown, the Chinese regime adopted four tactics to control Chinese-language media in America:

1.     Complete ownership of media or purchase of majority shares.

2.     Use of economic ties to influence media that had business ties in China.

3.     Purchase of advertising in media, which was tied to coverage.

4.     Deployment of government personnel to work in independent media, achieving influence from within the ranks.

 

According to Jamestown, three of the four major Chinese newspapers published in the U.S.Sing Tao Daily, Ming Pao Daily News, and The China Press – were under the direct influence of the Chinese Communist government. The fourth, World Journal, had increasingly adopted a pro-Beijing attitude. Three of those newspapers, Sing Tao, Ming Pao, and World Journal, also have editions in Canada.

 

A former high-ranked official at the Chinese consulate in Sydney told of similar tactics. In an interview, Chen Yonglin told The Epoch Times that Chinese officials would persuade businesses to advertise in media with acceptable coverage. Consular staff warned media when they crossed the lines, and they’d arrange to have overseas media carry content produced by media in Mainland China, where it would have already passed through the censors. The content was provided for free, and in some cases the Mainland media would even pay to have it republished abroad. He provided consulate memos to support some of his claims. This tactic is called “borrowing a boat to go overseas”.

 

Such arrangements may already be in place in Canada. Ming Pao Daily’s Canadian edition includes a regular page from the Guangzhou Daily in China. In an interview with The Epoch Times, Ming Pao’s CEO admitted that the newspaper does not pay for that content. The two main Toronto TV stations – Fairchild and Omni – each use free feeds from state-run China Central Television (CCTV).

 

Concerns were also raised after Canadian cable provider Rogers added nine state-run Chinese television channels to its cable line-up. The CRTC ruled one of the networks, CCTV-4, had aired content that could incite hatred or even violence against Falun Gong. Tibetans have also complained to the CRTC that recent CCTV-4 broadcasts vilifying the Dalai Lama and his followers has incited hate against them. 

 

Rogers has argued that they do not judge content and they provide maximum choice for their customers. However, though Rogers added the state-run networks as soon as they were available, it has not added New Tang Dynasty Television (NTDTV), which frequently reports critically of the Chinese regime, more than two years after CRTC granted NTDTV its license. The Epoch Times obtained a document from the Chinese Embassy in Ottawa dated March 2005 that details plans by the embassy to interfere with NTDTV’s bid to get on the air, including using front groups to complain to the CRTC and contacting Rogers directly. However, Rogers denies being pressured by the Chinese embassy.

 

In fact, the media that report candidly about human rights have also faced intimidation here in Canada. For example, after The Epoch Times broke the story about the reports of organ harvesting of Falun Gong practitioners in China, which was subsequently investigated by David Kilgour and David Matas, seven of our offices were broken into in short order worldwide, including an attempted break-in at our office here in Ottawa.

 

Both The Epoch Times and NTDTV have faced break-ins or vandalism to their offices, threats to advertisers, and other intimidation, such as theft of newspapers. I have personally received rounds of pre-recorded harassing phone calls in Chinese ten times dating back to April 2006. The calls come from China and come as early as 5 a.m.

 

3.       What Does This Mean for Canada?

 

According to the latest Census data, the Chinese-Canadian community has grown by 41 per cent in the last ten years to over 1.2 million, making it the largest visible minority group in the country. Surveys show that of this Chinese-Canadian population, as many as 74 per cent of new immigrants consume Chinese-language media, even though many of them are able to understand English. Thus, these Chinese-language media play a central role in helping new immigrants understand this society and even form their worldview.

 

Chinese-Canadians will rely on these media to form their understandings of democracy, the rule of law, human rights, other Western concepts, and even specific events. The content and nature of Chinese-language media in Canada thus deserves greater scrutiny.

 

Conclusion

 

As I have outlined above, there exists evidence that the Chinese regime is exerting influence on Chinese-language media in Canada through incentive, intimidation, and even harassment. The aim appears to be to instill and preserve loyalty to the Communist regime among the Chinese diaspora in Canada

 

However, the prospect of a foreign regime extending considerable, undue influence on such a large minority group also has implications for Canada at large. That is why efforts to interfere with the independence of our Chinese-language media must be addressed in all seriousness.

 

 

 

Presented at the Canadian Coalition for Democracies Symposium

The People’s Republic of China: Foreign Policy Risks and Opportunities

Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Room 200, West Block, Parliament Hill, Ottawa, Canada

You may post comments or questions at

http://canadiancoalition.com/forum/messages/31144.shtml