|
Guarding Ataturk's Legacy
Salim Mansur - Monday,18 June 2007
In
the past two months, millions of Turkish men and women of all ages have
been seen peacefully protesting in defence of secularism in cities
across Turkey. It's a remarkable sight: massive demonstrations of
Turkish Muslims publicly opposing the threat of creeping Islamization
in their country.
Turkey, with a population estimated at 75 million, is a state that
arose from the wreckage of the Ottoman Empire following the First World
War. Its modern history is largely the legacy of one man, Mustafa
Kemal, who made a nation out of a defeated and demoralized people.
Ataturk (Father of Turks), a surname Mustafa Kemal took for himself,
was a revolutionary in an age of revolution that began with the
Bolsheviks under Lenin seizing power in Moscow in October 1917. But
unlike Lenin, Ataturk was a nationalist and his revolution was not for
some imagined unknown future socialist utopia.
Ataturk willed for Turkey a future whose shape and content had already
been mapped out in Europe over the past two centuries of industrial
revolutions and democratic reforms, preceded by the struggles of
Reformation and Enlightenment that proved to be fatal for a decrepit
Ottoman Empire. Ataturk died in 1938 at the relatively young age of 58.
The Turkey he left behind was a republic and secular democracy.
Ataturk's revolution came to be known as Kemalism, and its guardians
became the senior generals of the Turkish military. Kemalism made
Turkey the first Muslim country to unambiguously embrace the modern
idea of secular democracy and reject the authority of Muslim clerics
supervising the rule of sharia (Islamic laws).
With the passage of time, Kemalism softened somewhat, and the majority
of Turks who never entirely abandoned Islam sought political
recognition of their faith tradition from the Kemalist state. In May
1999, however, conflict broke out between the military and Necmettin
Erbakan's Virtue party.
When Merve Kavakci, Erbakan's hand-picked female candidate, won a
parliamentary seat and wore a head scarf into the chamber, she was
greeted with outrage. Later she was stripped of her Turkish citizenship
on a technicality (she was also a U.S. citizen, which hadn't been
disclosed prior to her election), and was ousted from parliament.
Suleyman Demirel, Turkey's president, commented that the Kavakci
incident was "a symbol of bigger things, with its roots in
fundamentalism."
Turkey has been haunted since 1979 by the spectre of the Islamic
revolution in Iran. And, ironically, once again the head scarf has
ignited a constitutional crisis, bringing millions of Turks into the
streets to defend secularism.
The present government of Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his mildly
Islamic-oriented Justice and Development party nominated Foreign
Minister Abdullah Gul for the presidency. The wives of both Erdogan and
Gul wear head scarves, and secularists read this nomination as a
further encroachment--however mild in Turkey's closely monitored
secular environment--of political Islam into the public sphere.
Opposition to Gul's nomination carried the day and his nomination was
withdrawn. The government then called for a parliamentary election four
months ahead of schedule in July. Erdogan also proposed controversial
constitutional amendments to have the state president elected by the
public instead of by parliament, a move many fear would lead to further
encroachment of religion into the affairs of the state.
The amendments were vetoed by President Ahmet Necdet Sezer, the
retiring head of state. Existing laws forbid a second presidential
veto; Erdogan has indicated he will resubmit his amendments to the new
parliament.
The military generals for their part have let it be known they will
protect the secular nature of the state, and should Erdogan push ahead
with his amendments, the probability of a confrontation between the
military and politicians is real. A large segment of Turks, perhaps a
majority, would likely stand behind military action to oust an elected
government this time around.
The present political crisis in Turkey underscores the principle that
republican democracy is a system of rule based on constitutional
arrangements, and not merely rule by a simple majority of elected
representatives. Kemalism has assisted Turkey's transition into the
modern world, and though Turkey still has some distance to go, its
military guards Ataturk's most important legacy of strict separation of
politics and religion. Turkey's Muslim neighbours are depressing
examples of what occurs when religion and politics are joined together,
or cannot be kept apart.
|