Why you should care about Muslims vs Macleans

[ Follow-Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Canadian Coalition for Democracies Public Message Forum ]

Posted by AsianPacific Post on 11:09:50 2008/05/15

Your browser does not support inline frames, or it has been configured incorrectly. If page does not display on your browser, please <a href="http://www.asianpacificpost.com/portal2/c1ee8c4419de645c0119e8a8c7d2006d_Editorial__Why_you_should_care_about_Muslims_vs_Maclean_s.do.html">CLICK HERE</a>. Editorial: Why you should care about Muslims vs Maclean's window.name = 'pageView'; function toolsBarMouseOver(idImg) { document.getElementById(idImg).src='/portal2/images/layouts/apNewsDefault3ColStory/button_'+idImg+'_over.gif'; } function toolsBarMouseOut(idImg) { document.getElementById(idImg).src='/portal2/images/layouts/apNewsDefault3ColStory/button_'+idImg+'.gif'; } _uacct = "UA-68934-2"; urchinTracker(); View Classifieds Place Classifieds Subscribe Newsletter Minisites print email this page >> if(document.getElementById('search-text')) document.getElementById('search-text').onkeypress=_fn_search_enter_crkey About Us Subscribe Submit a Classified Ad Contact Us Advertise Top Stories Editorial Community News Diplomatic Community Metro News Asia Beat East Asia Philippines South Asia Malaysia/Singapore Indonesia The World Canada Business News Municipal Advisories Environment Noted and Quoted Letters to the Editor LifeStyle -- Community Events Passport Asia Spyces Diner's Guide Campus Scene Campus Scene Gallery Entertainment Education Career One union, two worlds Public Eye Gadgets Automotive Health News Lifestyle -- About Us -- About Us Subscribe Submit a Classified Ad Contact Us -- Editorial: Why you should care about Muslims vs Maclean's Wed, May 14 2008 "We can never be sure that the opinion we are endeavoring to stifle is a false opinion; and if we are sure, stifling it would be an evil still." A free speech carnival is coming to town next month and we hope the above words by John Stuart Mill, the 19th century British philosopher, will hang heavy on those appointed to sit in judgment. At issue is a complaint by a group of Canadian Muslims protesting the audacity of Maclean’s Magazine to run an article based on journalist Mark Steyn’s book, America Alone, entitled Why the Future Belongs to Islam. The public face of the case is a group of four law students from Toronto backed by the Canadian Islamic Congress. Together they claim that Maclean’s has fanned hatred and Islamophobia by putting forward the position that a global conspiracy involving Muslims is poised to take over the West and impose repressive Islamic laws. They say that the Steyn article is not the first time Maclean’s has crossed the line when it comes to matters of Islam and the incitement of hate. The group cites 21 other articles that apparently denigrate Islam and are racist in tone. Complaints have been launched with the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal and at the federal level. Another complaint by the same group was filed with the Ontario Human Rights Commission, which adjudicated that the contents of press articles are beyond its purview, yet sternly rebuked Maclean’s for contributing to Islamophobia and promoting societal intolerance towards Muslims. The Ontario Human Rights Commission did not allow Maclean’s to defend its views when providing its unsolicited scolding, much to the delight of the offended Muslims. Central to this fight to be staged in B.C., are the issues of press freedom, what constitutes hate literature, and the use of quasi-judicial bodies to set limits on our freedom of expression. First off, let’s get one thing straight: The Steyn article — love it or hate it — is a legitimate opinion. And those who objected to it were given abundant right of reply, which Maclean’s dutifully published. The most troubling thing about this case is the use of human rights bodies to be the arbiters of what Canadians should be allowed to read and what can be published. These bodies, mainly set up to deal with issues surrounding access to social housing and discrimination in the workplace, have an evidentiary threshold that revolves solely around the discretion of their appointed adjudicators. They do not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt. If a case is made well enough, they will accept the complainant’s view. Just check their track record. If the Steyn ramblings do indeed constitute hate literature, then the law students and the Canadian Islamic Congress should file a police report. They should also pursue Maclean’s through a legitimate civil lawsuit. But that would require them to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and provide documentation to show that Maclean’s has denied them due process — requirements they won’t have to fulfill at the human rights hearings. How and what these tribunals decide in a case is secondary to how they have come in the first place to sit in judgment over what Canadian media can publish. If we as Canadians truly value freedom of the press and free speech as the cornerstones of our democracy, we must protect them with the same vigor. It is an unacceptable precedent to allow the limits of free speech to be decided by a bureaucratic panel of so-called human-rights experts. Last week, the Canadian Islamic Congress and the offended Muslim students offered to drop the cases before the federal and B.C. Human Rights bodies in exchange for a 5,000-word article written by an author mutually agreed upon by both parties. Maclean’s rightly refused this 11th hour offer of conciliation, as it would be an acknowledgement that the magazine had done wrong, and a tacit nod to human rights commissions to regulate the content of print media publications in Canada. We may not agree with everything that is said or published in Maclean’s. But we must defend its right to say and publish it. Maclean’s should take this fight one step further — it should refuse to appear before these human rights bodies and, if need be, force the issue to the federal court for consideration. Our freedom of speech and, more importantly, our freedom after speech, must be decided by a legitimate authority. Tell us what you think Reader comments are edited for clarity and may be selected to appear in the print version of the Asian Pacific Post. *Name: *Email: (We will contact you if this comment is printed in the newspaper) City: Occupation: *Subject: *Message: &nbsp Your code * Enter code: *Mandatory fields Please limit your post to 2000 characters performAction(''); Related Deals Blanche Macdonald NEW Professional Hair Program Blanche Macdonald Make-up Artistry Programs There are 3 Make- up Artistry Program Blanche Macdonald Fashion Design Program Blanche Macdonald Fashion Merchandising Program Related Partners Times Telecom Times Telecom is a leading retail Long-Distance Service Provider More Stalla Use the Stalla System More FIC Your pathway to Simon Fraser University More Simon Fraser University Simon Fraser University's New Transfer Program More Roma Furniture Contemporary furniture for modern homes More TSI Travel Get the latest deals at TSI travel More Jester’s Grill and Tap Room A stylish, cozy lounge in Downtown Vancouver. More ABF Financial Group A full service company that offers training and career paths into the world of mortgage and realty. A one stop service centre. More Chambar Belgian Restaurant Open evening 5:30pm-11pm Chambar is a stylish and hip restaurant downtown that offers Belgian cuisine in a fun and lively atmosphere. More Wesminster Savings Credit Union Providing full financial services to BC residents of the Lower Mainland More Top Stories Designer profiling Asian eyes are in as beauty ideal shifts Editorial: Mind your language, Immigration Canada Devastating cyclone brings winds of change to Burma Immigration from all angles The Innocent Man, Freedom at Last While on Tibet, India and China beg some comparisons Companies turn to Facebook in search of staff Editorials Editorial: Why is Chuck Cadman being called a liar? Editorial: China belches, B.C. coughs, you pay Editorial: Red tape, secrecy and foreign aid Editorial: What are our judges smoking? Editorial: The Asian flavour in American politics Editorial: Time to pull trigger on handgun ban Editorial: Canada’s game of hide and Sikh Editorial: Overhaul youth crime law Editorial: Year of living dangerously Editorial: Other side of migration Related Stories Khac Chi performs catchy Vietnamese tunes Mar 20 2008 TTI: New Program Sep 20 2005 SFU: Award Oct 07 2004 B.C. teacher fights to see his children Jun 09 2006 School attack triggers outrage and paranoia Mar 19 2008 Global Tesol: In Japan Aug 24 2005 Global Tesol: Free Seminar Aug 04 2005 School daze for English teachers Dec 20 2007 India: Project in Education Aug 08 2005 BC tutor facing death penalty pleads to see his dad Jan 19 2006 About Us Subscribe Submit a Classified Ad Advertise Contact Us Downloads Mini-Websites Career Opportunities View Newspaper Copyright © 2008 Asian Pacific Post. All Right Reserved. Back to Top var dc_UnitID = 14; var dc_PublisherID = 37437; var dc_AdLinkColor = 'blue'; var dc_adprod='ADL'; var dc_open_new_win = 'yes';

Click here to visit inline page

WE NEED YOUR HELP!
Please take 2 minutes to
join CCD or make a donation.
Thank you for your generosity.

Follow Ups:

Re: Muslims Can Threaten the West But Westerners Cannot Say So - Bill Narvey 15:46:25 2008/05/15 (0)

Post a Followup

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Canadian Coalition for Democracies Public Message Forum ]

Name:
E-Mail: (Optional)
Subject:
Comments:
Link URL: (Optional)
Link Title:
Image URL: (Optional)